Tests have shown that consumers have a better understanding of the consequences of a minimum payment when disclosure is based on their actual balance rather than on a hypothetical balance. The final rule therefore encourages card issuers to make minimum payment returns based on the actual balances of cardholders instead of a hypothetical balance. As an incentive, the final rule states that card issuers, when using actual balances, are not required to disclose the warning, hypothetical example or green number in the periodic return. Instead, the issuer must disclose how long it will take to pay the current balance if only minimum payments are made. In order to help consumers who have applied for a subprime credit card, without realizing that it entails a low credit limit and significant charges for opening the account, the final rule requires issuers to disclose to consumers a right to refuse the card when opening the account if an account opening fee has been charged to the account but the consumer has not used the card. Consumers who use this right would not be responsible for royalties. 1. Unless indicated below, the credit card issuer must publish and keep on its publicly accessible website the credit card agreements that the issuer must submit to the Bureau in accordance with Article 1026.58 (c). With respect to an agreement offered exclusively for accounts under one or more private label credit card plans, an issuer may meet this requirement by publishing the agreement on the publicly available website of at least one merchant who can use credit cards issued as part of any credit card plan of 10,000 euros or more. , in accordance with this section.
The 25% limit applies to credit issuance or availability fees, but does not apply to discretionary fees. For example, if a card issuer charges an optional fee to get an additional credit card, the fee is not included in the 25% calculation. If the issuer increases the credit limit during the first year an account is opened, the issuer cannot increase the amount of fees required. If the issuer reduces the amount of the loan in the first year, it must remove or waive all fees that exceed the 25% limit. The CARD Act imposes a legal payment allocation rule: when a consumer makes a payment above the issuer`s minimum payment, the card issuer must first assign the surplus to the balance with the highest balance and the remaining portion of the other balances in descending order on the basis of the RPA. The Commission has transposed this requirement to 226.53 (a), subject to two exceptions for deferred interest programs. First, payments above the minimum made in the last two months of a deferred interest rate program must first be allocated to the deferred interest balance. Second, if the consumer has a program with deferred interest, a card issuer can award a payment in the manner demanded by the consumer. To facilitate compliance, OSC comment 226.53-5 contains examples of payment allocation. Some issuers have begun to offer a feature using the existing credit line of a card to provide a separate fixed repayment plan for payments for the revolving balance on the account. Issuers have implemented many of these payment options on the card services platform to facilitate registration. The new flexible payment functions of credit card accounts can be divided into two categories: those that provide a payment plan for existing purchases and those that provide a payment schedule for future purchases.
 Review of legislation and invitation to comment; Information on the credit card market for consumers.
Published by: admin